r/telescopes aims to be a high quality sub where users can discuss all things telescopes and astronomy, but allowing such repetitive and low-effort posts will drastically lower the overall quality of the sub. Low-effort content such as those complaining about the weather (we get it, clouds are bad), simple questions that usually result in one line responses (these should be posted in our weekly discussion threads instead), general 'shitposting', memes, etc. Titles should be descriptive about what you're discussing/posting. Titles should not be 'clickbaity' nor self-deprecating - we're all here to learn so there is no point in calling yourself a 'noob' and/or putting yourself down. Concept art is not permitted, nor is content not relating to visual astronomy/telescopes. Images must be taken by you, with gear which you own - remote or professional services such as DSW or Hubble are not permitted. This enforces quality, encourages discussion, and benefits everyone. This includes your gear as well as any processing you did to the image. Images must have a top-level comment containing acquisition and processing details. Self promotion is only permitted to active members of the community. Not providing commentary, or posting content from a single source will be assumed to be attempts of driving traffic, which is not allowed here. This sub is a place for everyone to learn and help each other, and such behaviour only does bad things to everyone involved.ĭirect links should be accompanied by commentary as a top level comment, and should be a source of discussion. Non-civil behaviour such as insulting, flaming, etc, will not be tolerated. You can post used item ads here, but do post them on other communities or websites such as Cloudynights, Astromart, etc. There are other subs and communities for this. Links to petitions, surveys, crowdfunders, and other advertisements to sell your own products are prohibited here. Failure to read and posting "which telescope should I buy" will result in your post being removed and you being referred to this guide. If you're totally new to telescopes and astronomy, please read our Beginner's Quick Guide to choosing your first telescope which is sticky'd to the top of the subreddit. Posts are helpful for people with similar questions.)īefore posting, make sure your post follows the subreddit rules otherwise they may be removed. ( For more in-depth help, please use the subreddit. Anything that relates to amateur astronomy and its practice. Maybe swapping out the crunchy options for a couple more acoustic models would have made it even more useful, but this remains an appealing six-string multi-tool and a genuine problem-solver for many gigging players.Telescopes, eyepieces, events, marathons, charts, eyepieces, reviews, marathons, articles, etc. “The launch of the Acoustasonic Player Telecaster feels like a no-brainer move for Fender, spreading the potential appeal of what is virtually a whole new category of guitar. From where Im from, telescopes are quite expensive and Im limited to Celestron brands only. The feel of the bevelled arm rest and fingerboard edges says quality and comfort this is an inviting guitar and that Modern Deep-C neck will feel familiar to anyone who has played the electric Player series models.” Celestron Omni - posted in Beginners Forum (No Astrophotography): Hi guys, Im new to this hobby and is looking at buying my new telescope. A lovely dark rosewood fingerboard and bridge replaces the US version’s ebony, but that’s not anissue for us. “In terms of feel and build, we honestly can’t find a compromise between this Ensenada-made Player and the US Acoustasonics we’ve tried. MusicRadar: The onboard voice options might have been scaled down but the Acoustasonic Telecaster sticks the landing as a Player Series model, in what could be one of the guitars to make the hybrid build truly go mainstream.įender Player Series Acoustasonic Telecaster: The web says That, in sum, is the sort of thing the Acoustasonic format encourages. That said, it can be pressed into service of many different kinds of styles, perhaps some that are all your own. It is warmer, with a little more width than you’d expect from a Tele’s bridge pickup. Fender promises twang but this isn’t Pete Anderson levels of twang. Park yourself on position one for a more traditional electric guitar experience, but don’t necessarily expect a traditional Telecaster experience. In a sense, this is a sound that almost exists outside of the spectrum of acoustic/electric tones, and is sure to support pedalboard experimentation. The sound is just coming from the piezo and as you turn the blend control it adds drive. Here is where the true hybrid tones are, and as such, there are fewer references for what we are hearing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |